NODE ARCHITECTURES FOR NEXT GENERATION ROADMS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG EMERGENT OPTICAL SOLUTIONS

Authors

  • Eduardo C. Magalhães
  • Marcelo R. Nascimento
  • Vinícius G. de Oliveira
  • Bruno C. C. Angeli
  • Juliano R. F. de Oliveira
  • Júlio C. R. F. de Oliveira
  • Aldário C. Bordonalli

Keywords:

ROADM, next generation optical network, multicast switch, cross-connect, WSS

Abstract

Reconfigurable optical add and drop multiplexers (ROADMs) are key components to increase the dynamicity and flexibility of optical networks. In its first generation, solely based on PLC and WSS-technology, ROADMs allowed service providers to automate some of its network operations, reducing the OPEX and improving the quality of service offered to the customer. However, the current solution is limited to several constrains such as direction, color and contention, and still demands truck rolls and manual reconfiguration depending on the desired operation. To address this limitation, new optical components are emerging and particularly two node architectures are being considered as most promising candidates: multicast switch with optical amplification array and dense low loss fiber optical cross-connect with MUX/DEMUX AWGs. This paper compares both solutions, and a third variation using fiber OXC in conjunction with WSS, from a CAPEX and OPEX perspective. It concludes that depending on the network scenario one solution is more suitable than the others and probably, in the next generation reality, different node architectures will be required in different portions of a same network.

References

[1] P. D. Colbourne and B. Collings, “ROADM switching technologies”, in Optical Fiber Communication Conference.
Optical Society of America, 2011, p. OTuD1.
[2] T. Watanabe et al., “Compact PLC-based transponder aggregator for colorless and directionless ROADM”, in
Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Optical Society of America, 2011, p. OtuD3.
[3] R. Jensen et al., “Highly Scalable OXC-based Contentionless ROADM Architecture with Reduced Network
Implementation Cost”, in Optical Fiber Communication Conference., Optical Society of America, 2012, p.NW3F.7.
[4] M. D. Feuer et al., “Intra-node contention in dynamic photonic networks”, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 29, no. 4,
pp. 529–535, Feb 2011.
[5] P. Pavon-Marino and M. Bueno-Delgado, “Distributed online RWA considering add/drop contention in the nodes
for directionless and colorless ROADMs”, in National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, Optical Society of America,
2012, paper NW3F.4.
[6] S. Perrin, “The need for next-generation ROADM networks”, Heavy Reading, September 2010.
[7] L. Eldada, “ROADM architectures and technologies for agile optical networks”, DuPont Photonics Technologies,
100 Fordham Road, Wilmington, MA, 01887, USA, 2007, p. Proc. SPIE 6476.
[8] J. Zyskind and A. Srivastava, “Optically Amplified WDM Networks”, ser. Academic Press. Elsevier, 2010.
[9] Y. H. Ishii et al., “MEMS-based 1x43 wavelength-selective switch with flat passband”, in European Conference on
Optical Communication, 2009.
[10] S. Tibuleac and M. Filer, “Trends in next-generation ROADM networks”, in 37th European Conference and
Exposition on Optical Communications. Optical Society of America, 2011, p. Th.12.A.1.
[11] I. W. Winston, “Optimum Architecture for MXN Multicast Switch-Based Colorless, Directionless, Contentionless,
and Flexible-Grid ROADM”, in Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Optical Society of America, 2012, p.
NW3F.5
[12] R. Jensen, “Optical switch architectures for emerging colorless/directionless/contentionless ROADM networks”, in
Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Optical Society of America, 2011, p.OThR3.
[13] W. V. Heddeghem et al, “Power consumption modeling in optical multilayer networks”, Photonic Network
Communications, vol. 24, pp. 86-102, Jan. 2012.
[14] J. Baliga et al, “Energy Consumption in Optical IP Networks”, J. Lightw. Technol., vol.27, n. 13, pp. 2391-2403,
Jul. 2009.
[15] D. C. Kilper et al, “Power Trends in Communication Networks”, J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron., vol. 17, n. 2,
pp. 275-284, Apr. 2011.
[16] G. P. Agrawal,“Fiber-optic Communication Systems”. Wiley, 2010.
[17] S. Aleksic, “Energy and entropy flow in erbium-doped fiber amplifiers: a thermodynamic approach”, J. Lightw.
Technol., vol.30, pp. 2832-2838, Sept. 2012.
[18] A.W.Naji et al, “Modeling and characterization of a new three-stage quadruple pass EDFA”, pp. 458-461 in
ICCCE, Jul. 2012.
[19] R. S. Tucker, “Green Optical Communications—Part I: Energy Limitations in Transport”, IEEE Journ. of Selected
Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 245-260, Mar.-Apr., 2011.
[20] R. S. Tucker, “Green Optical Communications—Part II: Energy Limitations in Networks”, IEEE Journ. of
Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 261-274, Mar.-Apr., 2011.
[21] K. Grobe et al. “Cost and energy consumption analysis of advanced WDM-PONs”, Communications Magazine,
IEEE , vol.49, no.2, pp. 25-32, Feb. 2011.

Downloads

Published

2013-08-01

How to Cite

Eduardo C. Magalhães, Marcelo R. Nascimento, Vinícius G. de Oliveira, Bruno C. C. Angeli, Juliano R. F. de Oliveira, Júlio C. R. F. de Oliveira, & Aldário C. Bordonalli. (2013). NODE ARCHITECTURES FOR NEXT GENERATION ROADMS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG EMERGENT OPTICAL SOLUTIONS. Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications (JMOe), 12, si156-si166. Retrieved from http://www.jmoe.org/index.php/jmoe/article/view/396